Thick panel origami for load-bearing deployable structures
Mechanics Research Communications, ISSN: 0093-6413, Vol: 124, Page: 103937
2022
- 19Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Origami-based deployable structures are of great interest as they can be manufactured and folded from thin flat sheets of material. However, the thin nature of origami panels results in a weak structural form at configurations close to unfolded or developed geometries. It, therefore, limits the functionality of such structures in applications involving load-bearing and full-unfolding. In this work, we show that by using the thick panel versions of the origami structures, one could obtain better load-bearing characteristics, especially at configurations close to the fully-unfolded geometries obtained through deployment. Specifically, we compare and contrast the geometry and structural behavior of a Yoshimura origami structure made from thin and thick panels. We present and implement a geometric framework to calculate the nodal coordinates of tessellated thick Yoshimura structures with arbitrarily specified panel dimensions and folded states. We discuss the structural modeling of a three-cell Yoshimura at a meter length scale and perform structural analysis at various folded configurations. We demonstrate the suitability of the thick panel structure over the thin panel version for resisting applied loads at configurations close to the fully-deployed state. The results indicate that employing thick panel geometries could enable the use of origami-based deployable structures at large length scales, especially for applications involving load-bearing.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093641322000830; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2022.103937; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85135866608&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0093641322000830; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2022.103937
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know