Challenging neurovascular coupling through complex and variable duration cognitive paradigms: A subcomponent analysis
Medical Engineering & Physics, ISSN: 1350-4533, Vol: 110, Page: 103921
2022
- 3Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A similar pattern of cerebral blood velocity (CBv) response has been observed for neurovascular coupling (NVC) assessment with cognitive tasks of varying complexity and duration. This lack of specificity could result from parallel changes in arterial blood pressure (BP) and PaCO 2, which could confound the estimates of NVC integrity. Healthy participants ( n = 16) underwent recordings at rest (5 min sitting) and during randomized paradigms of different complexity (naming words (NW) beginning with P-, R-, V- words and serial subtractions (SS) of 100–2, 100–7, 1000–17, with durations of 5, 30 and 60 s). Bilateral CBv (middle cerebral arteries, transcranial Doppler), end-tidal CO 2 (EtCO 2, capnography), blood pressure (BP, Finapres) and heart rate (HR, ECG) were recorded continuously. The bilateral CBv response to all paradigms was classified under objective criteria to select only responders, then the repeated data were averaged between visits. Bilateral CBv change to tasks was decomposed into the relative contributions (subcomponents) of arterial BP (V BP ; neurogenic), critical closing pressure (V CrCP ; metabolic) and resistance area product (V RAP ; myogenic). A temporal effect was demonstrated in bilateral V BP and V RAP during all tasks ( p <0.002), increased V BP early (between 0 and 10 s) and followed by decreases of V RAP late (25–35 s) in the response. V CrCP varied by complexity and duration ( p <0.046). The main contributions to CBv responses to cognitive tasks of different complexity and duration were V BP and V RAP, whilst a smaller contribution from V CrCP would suggest sensitivity to metabolic demands. Further studies are needed to assess the influence of different paradigms, ageing and cerebrovascular conditions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453322001692; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103921; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85141891078&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564144; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1350453322001692; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103921
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know