Predicting the progression of mild cognitive impairment using machine learning: A systematic, quantitative and critical review
Medical Image Analysis, ISSN: 1361-8415, Vol: 67, Page: 101848
2021
- 61Citations
- 155Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations61
- Citation Indexes61
- 61
- CrossRef41
- Captures155
- Readers155
- 155
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Predicting the progression of mild cognitive impairment using machine learning: A systematic, quantitative and critical review.
Med Image Anal. 2020 Oct 6;67:101848. Authors: Ansart M, Epelbaum S, Bassignana G, Bône A, Bottani S, Cattai T, Couronné R, Faouzi J, Koval I, Louis M, Thibeau-Sutre E, Wen J, Wild A, Burgos N, Dormont D, Colliot O, Durrleman S PubMed: 33091740 Submit Comment
Article Description
We performed a systematic review of studies focusing on the automatic prediction of the progression of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia, and a quantitative analysis of the methodological choices impacting performance. This review included 172 articles, from which 234 experiments were extracted. For each of them, we reported the used data set, the feature types, the algorithm type, performance and potential methodological issues. The impact of these characteristics on the performance was evaluated using a multivariate mixed effect linear regressions. We found that using cognitive, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography or potentially electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography variables significantly improved predictive performance compared to not including them, whereas including other modalities, in particular T1 magnetic resonance imaging, did not show a significant effect. The good performance of cognitive assessments questions the wide use of imaging for predicting the progression to AD and advocates for exploring further fine domain-specific cognitive assessments. We also identified several methodological issues, including the absence of a test set, or its use for feature selection or parameter tuning in nearly a fourth of the papers. Other issues, found in 15% of the studies, cast doubts on the relevance of the method to clinical practice. We also highlight that short-term predictions are likely not to be better than predicting that subjects stay stable over time. These issues highlight the importance of adhering to good practices for the use of machine learning as a decision support system for the clinical practice.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361841520302127; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2020.101848; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092919416&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33091740; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1361841520302127; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2020.101848
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know