CReg-KD: Model refinement via confidence regularized knowledge distillation for brain imaging
Medical Image Analysis, ISSN: 1361-8415, Vol: 89, Page: 102916
2023
- 7Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
One of the core challenges of deep learning in medical image analysis is data insufficiency, especially for 3D brain imaging, which may lead to model over-fitting and poor generalization. Regularization strategies such as knowledge distillation are powerful tools to mitigate the issue by penalizing predictive distributions and introducing additional knowledge to reinforce the training process. In this paper, we revisit knowledge distillation as a regularization paradigm by penalizing attentive output distributions and intermediate representations. In particular, we propose a Confidence Regularized Knowledge Distillation (CReg-KD) framework, which adaptively transfers knowledge for distillation in light of knowledge confidence. Two strategies are advocated to regularize the global and local dependencies between teacher and student knowledge. In detail, a gated distillation mechanism is proposed to soften the transferred knowledge globally by utilizing the teacher loss as a confidence score. Moreover, the intermediate representations are attentively and locally refined with key semantic context to mimic meaningful features. To demonstrate the superiority of our proposed framework, we evaluated the framework on two brain imaging analysis tasks (i.e. Alzheimer's Disease classification and brain age estimation based on T1-weighted MRI) on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative dataset including 902 subjects and a cohort of 3655 subjects from 4 public datasets. Extensive experimental results show that CReg-KD achieves consistent improvements over the baseline teacher model and outperforms other state-of-the-art knowledge distillation approaches, manifesting that CReg-KD as a powerful medical image analysis tool in terms of both promising prediction performance and generalizability.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361841523001767; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2023.102916; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85166926033&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37549611; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1361841523001767; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2023.102916
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know