Hydrogen production with carbon dioxide capture by dual-phase ceramic-carbonate membrane reactor via steam reforming of methane
Journal of Membrane Science, ISSN: 0376-7388, Vol: 598, Page: 117780
2020
- 56Citations
- 79Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The existing process for hydrogen production from methane through steam-reforming requires multiple reactors and separators and is thus costly and energy-intensive. This paper reports a new concept of CO 2 -permselective membrane reactor for promoting hydrogen production via steam reforming of methane (SRM) with CO 2 capture. The membrane reactor is made of a ceramic-carbonate dual-phase membrane with a two-layered asymmetric wall structure. Bismuth-yttrium-samarium oxide (Bi 1.5 Y 0.3 Sm 0.2 O 3-δ, BYS) was added to the support layer to make it non-wettable by molten carbonate, leaving the samarium-doped ceria (Sm 0.2 Ce 0.8 O 2-δ, SDC) layer to form a thin (~150 μm) CO 2 -permselective SDC/molten-carbonate dual-phase layer after molten carbonate infiltration. The output product composition from the membrane reactor confirms that in situ CO 2 removal effectively promotes water-gas shift conversion in SRM and thus enhances hydrogen yield. At 900 °C with feed pressure at 1 atm, the membrane reactor achieves 90% hydrogen yield with 84% CO 2 recovery, which poses significant improvement when compared with conventional fixed-bed reactor under similar conditions. Analysis of CO 2 permeation activation energy suggests that surface reaction rate might have an effect on CO 2 permeation flux for the thin SDC/molten-carbonate membranes. Under atmospheric conditions the CO 2 permeation with reactive feed for SRM is lower than with non-reactive feed due to lower driving force under reactive conditions in the feed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376738819335045; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117780; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078851583&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0376738819335045; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0376738819335045?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0376738819335045?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117780
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know