Direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) process for simulated brackish water treatment: An especial emphasis on impacts of antiscalants
Journal of Membrane Science, ISSN: 0376-7388, Vol: 643, Page: 120017
2022
- 12Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Membrane distillation (MD) has been considered as a promising technique for brackish water desalination, while the membrane fouling issue, especially the membrane scaling, have been the main obstacle for the widespread application of MD system. Antiscalant, as an economical tool for scaling control, has been widely applied to other membrane separation processes, like RO and UF. Therefore, three types of typical antiscalants, including PBTCA, DTPMPA, and HPMA, were applied in this work to investigate their anti-scaling performances during the MD desalination of brackish water. Additionally, the impacts of antiscalants on fouling layer development as well as the desalination efficiency of MD system were also deeply researched in this study. Compared to DTPMPA, PBTCA and HPMA performed better scaling inhibition in MD system, resulting in remarkable mitigation of flux decline. With the usage of PBTCA, these mineral substances were largely distributed in feed solutions with the dissolved state, partly facilitating the biofilm formation. Differently, these salts mainly existed in the form of distorted slags with the presence of HPMA, and the biofilm development was notably retarded by the deposited slags. These loose slags could be easily removed from the MD membrane by increasing the feed flow velocity, thus it can be summarized that HPMA was more suitable for the long-period MD desalination of brackish water. The application of DTPMPA should be strictly restricted in MD desalination units considering the risk of pore wetting.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376738821009583; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.120017; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85118478377&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0376738821009583; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.120017
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know