An investigation into the effects of contouring process parameters on the up-skin surface characteristics in laser powder-bed fusion process
Manufacturing Letters, ISSN: 2213-8463, Vol: 35, Page: 707-716
2023
- 7Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Laser powder-bed fusion (L-PBF) additive manufacturing is reshaping how parts are designed and built in the aerospace, automotive, biomedical, and other industries. However, in several applications, the quality of the components in terms of surface roughness, density, and mechanical properties is not comparable to that of parts made by conventional manufacturing processes. Multiple process parameters and associated uncertainties strongly influence the properties of L-PBF built parts. This study aims to understand the effects of contouring process parameters on the formation of up-skin surfaces and roughness variability in an inclined build scenario. Through Design of Experiment (DOE), the influence of the contour process parameters, such as the laser power, scanning speed, contouring offset, and incline angle (θ, between 30° and 60°), on upward-facing surfaces is investigated. Furthermore, a comprehensive multi-physics Computational Thermo-fluid model and Discrete Element Method (DEM) simulation framework is developed to shed light on how contouring scans affect the morphology of the upward-facing surface. The developed thermo-fluid model framework is used to perform multi-track multi-layer simulations of an L-PBF process. Numerical data suggests that a higher laser power enlarges the melt-pool size providing sufficient fusion at the border, hence, improving the density of up-skin regions. A higher density may primarily contribute to a better surface finish for up-skin features. The experimental result analysis shows that in the tested slope range (30° ≤ θ ≤ 60°), the up-skin surface roughness exacerbates with the increase of the incline angle and the scanning speed. On the other hand, a higher laser power will result in better surface finishes. The findings also indicate that a higher linear energy density (LED = Power/Speed) for contour scans is more favourable for the range of parameters tested in this study. Within the range of studied contouring process parameters, the maximum and minimum of average roughness (R a ) values for up-skin surfaces are 21.2 ± 2.9 µm and 8 ± 0.6 µm, respectively.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846323001426; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2023.08.085; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85173230989&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213846323001426; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2023.08.085
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know