RETRACTED: Preoperative evaluation of tavi for aortic stenosis based on embedded system and dual-source CT large-pitch scanning
Microprocessors and Microsystems, ISSN: 0141-9331, Vol: 82, Page: 103849
2021
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
Trans Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) catheter veins in the upper bit of the legs and chest by embedding a catheter; it consolidates the aortic valve. By then, coordinate the catheter, which is used to ensure the replacement valve on top of the old. Reachability before CT imaging of the third through the aortic valve implanted in the (Dual-Source Computed Tomography) DSCT scanner age wide-show TAVI method is used to evaluate the precision of the image quality and contrast decline volume show. Computed Tomography (CT ) scanner called the wide show, and TAVI appraisal of the total amount of contrast pro channel shows and 50 ml. A visual score of 4 centers (4–1) will be used to survey the image's idea. Distinction decreasing worth and Contrast-To-Noise Ratio (CNR) is the aortic root, climbing/plunging aorta is assessed in the aorta of unusual levels, it has left the right level and femoral flexibly course. To evaluate the coronary passageway tree, it is differentiated and coronary angiography. Assessments of the aortic valve annulus, to break down, is the result of the latest frameworks. Creatinine of the patient is checked at design; it chipped away at the following 72 h.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141933121000296; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2021.103849; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85099163427&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0141933121000296; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2021.103849
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know