Efficacy and safety of phage therapy against Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium and Enteritidis estimated by using a battery of in vitro tests and the Galleria mellonella animal model
Microbiological Research, ISSN: 0944-5013, Vol: 261, Page: 127052
2022
- 27Citations
- 89Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations27
- Citation Indexes27
- 27
- CrossRef21
- Captures89
- Readers89
- 89
Article Description
In light of spreading antibiotic resistance among pathogenic bacteria, the development of novel approaches to combat such microorganisms is crucial. Salmonella enterica is pathogenic to humans, however, it can also infect poultry, being a potential foodborne pathogen when poultry-derived food is contaminated by this bacterium. Phage therapy is one of the alternative ways to treat Salmonella -infected animals while the establishment of this method and its introduction to a general practice requires detailed studies on safety and efficacy. Here, we present the results of such studies with two previously isolated and characterized bacteriophages, vB_SenM2 and vB_Sen-TO17, and four strains of S. enterica belonging to two serovars, Typhimurium and Enteritidis. We demonstrated effective reduction of bacterial cell number and cell culture density when using each phage alone, and in combination (as a cocktail). These phages were also effective in reducing bacterial biofilm. The efficacy of this in vitro phage therapy was compared to the action of known antibiotics, as was the efficiency of appearance of bacteria resistant to both these types of antibacterial agents. Safety of the use of bacteriophages was demonstrated using the LAL chromogenic test and the chicken fibroblast viability assay. Finally, the efficacy of phage therapy was assessed with the in vivo model of S. enterica -infected Galleria mellonella larvae, showing a significant improvement in the survival of the animals. In conclusion, we demonstrated high efficacy and acceptable safety profiles of phage therapy against S. enterica strains using vB_SenM-2 and vB_Sen-TO17 phages (both alone and in a cocktail). These results open a possibility for a trial with the use of poultry and these phages which might potentially allow to introduce of this method for practical use in poultry farming.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0944501322000921; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2022.127052; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85129896011&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35533436; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0944501322000921; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2022.127052
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know