Evaluation of the intrinsic pH sensing performance of surface-enhanced Raman scattering pH probes
Microchemical Journal, ISSN: 0026-265X, Vol: 154, Page: 104565
2020
- 21Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) has shown a high promise in microenvironmental pH sensing in recent years, which is significant for understanding various biological processes and multiphase chemical reactions. Generally, the pH sensing capability of the SERS substrate is realized by the surface functionalization of the substrate with a pH sensitive molecule (pH probe). However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no systematic evaluation of mainstream SERS pH probes reported in literatures on the pH response range, resistance to co-present ions, accuracy and stability. Here a systematic analysis of common pH probes, including 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (4-MBA), 4-mercaptopyridine (4-Mpy), 2-aminobenzenethiol (2-ABT), and 4-aminothiophenol (4-ATP) has been carried out with a series of performance assessments. Density functional theory (DFT) calculation was carried out to investigate the vibration mode in SERS spectra. Moreover, the practical application comparison was conducted with urine samples. Overall, 4-MBA showed an excellent sensing performance in the neutral and alkaline area, and meanwhile, the pH response of 4-Mpy and 4-ATP was inclined to the acidic and neutral range. The pH probe 2-ABT is not recommend because of the poor performance.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0026265X19332710; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.104565; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85076917781&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0026265X19332710; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.104565
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know