Tips and tricks for successful preparation of molecularly imprinted polymers for analytical applications: A critical review
Microchemical Journal, ISSN: 0026-265X, Vol: 193, Page: 109152
2023
- 48Citations
- 72Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) are well historically known class of material that have wide range of applications. Regarding chemical analysis, MIPs could replace biogenic materials, such as antibodies, to impart the required selectivity for analytical method. Apart from other purposes, preparing a MIP for analysis requires particular attention to certain aspects critically affecting the overall efficiency of the imprinting process. In this review we emphasized the critical steps during MIP preparation and characterization that would significantly affect the assessment of imprinting efficiency. MIP preparation starts with the selection of suitable monomers based on the nature of the used template. The template tends to form a stable complex with the used monomers. According to the type of bond formed between template and monomer molecules, three imprinting approaches are reported: covalent, non-covalent, and semi covalent. Then, polymerization of that complex takes place to produce MIP with template occupied binding sites or imprint cavities. So, for the completion of imprinting process and hence vacant cavity production, a suitable effective extraction technique is used. The assessment of template extraction process can be either direct, by template detection in the washing solution, or indirect, by measuring certain physical property of the polymer before and after template removal. Finally, the different parameters determined to assess the imprinting efficiency were summarized and the different sources of errors were addressed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0026265X23007713; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2023.109152; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85166977148&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0026265X23007713; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2023.109152
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know