Comparative study of lattice parameter and pore size of ordered mesoporous silica materials using physisorption, SAXS measurements and transmission electron microscopy
Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, ISSN: 1387-1811, Vol: 354, Page: 112508
2023
- 8Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A precise knowledge of the structural properties of ordered mesoporous materials is essential for their use in almost every application. Researchers use various methods, based on transmission electron microscopy, physisorption and scattering experiments to obtain this data. Here, we evaluate and compare the different methods for four different mesoporous silica materials with pore sizes ranging from 3 to 11 nm. We use the commonly applied methods of physisorption to measure the pore size, fitting of small-angle X-ray scattering data to obtain both the pore size and the lattice parameter, and estimate the lattice parameter from transmission electron micrographs. Besides this, we extract information about the pore sizes from electron density maps. We perform a comparative analysis of the different methods as well as discuss their advantages and disadvantages. We find that all methods deliver comparable results over the investigated pore size range and thus are interchangeable. The only exception is the evaluation of physisorption data of very small mesopores with the BJH method, which does not provide meaningful results.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1387181123000793; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2023.112508; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85150413865&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1387181123000793; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2023.112508
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know