Development of an indirect Enzyme Linked Immunoassay (iELISA) using monoclonal antibodies against Photorhabdus insect related toxins, PirA Vp and PirB Vp released from Vibrio spp
Journal of Microbiological Methods, ISSN: 0167-7012, Vol: 176, Page: 106002
2020
- 18Citations
- 32Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- 18
- CrossRef2
- Captures32
- Readers32
- 32
Article Description
An acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND) causes serious losses to the global shrimp industry. The etiologic agent of AHPND is Vibrio spp. carrying a large plasmid which encodes a binary toxin, PirAB. Currently, AHPND is diagnosed by PCR based methods that detect the presences of both pir A and pir B genes. However, the bacterial strains containing the pir A and pir B genes do not always express the binary toxin, resulting in mis-estimation of the virulence of bacterial strains containing pir A and pir B genes. Thus, the immuno based assay (i.e. ELISA) is a promising approach to detect PirA Vp and PirB Vp. In the present study, a total of forty monoclonal antibodies clones (mAb) against PirA Vp (20 mAbs) and PirB Vp (20 mAbs) were screened by western blot analysis to select four mAb clones that show the strongest immunoreactivity in indirect ELISA (iELISA). The four selected mAbs (i.e. 1B9 and 5E9 against PirA Vp ; 7B7 and 7B9 against PirB Vp ) detected specifically Vibrio spp. causing AHPND. In addition, four selected mAbs were able to detect either PirA Vp or PirB Vp down to 0.008 ng/μl. A double blind assay using thirty AHPND-infected and six SPF shrimp Penaeus vannamei were analyzed by iELISA to determine the detection sensitivity of the assay. The results showed that iELISA was able to accurately detect 29 out of 30 AHPND infected shrimp. These finding indicated that iELISA is a reliable method to detect PirA Vp and PirB Vp toxins in infected shrimp and will be a useful tool in AHPND diagnosis and in studying the role of binary toxins in AHPND pathogenesis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701220304772; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2020.106002; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087841072&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32653400; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167701220304772; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2020.106002
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know