Immunological evaluation of recombinant chimeric construct from Enterotoxigenic E. coli expressed in hairy roots
Molecular Immunology, ISSN: 0161-5890, Vol: 147, Page: 81-89
2022
- 3Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli is the most important bacterial agent causing traveller’s diarrhea in developing countries. Enterotoxins (LT & ST) and colonization factors (CFs) are two important factors in the ETEC pathogenesis. In the present study, a recombinant four-part fusion protein containing CFAB*ST, CFAE, and LTB (CCL) was expressed in hairy roots of Nicotiana tabacum. The synthetic gene sequence and gene order were designed based on bioinformatics analysis that predicted the best arrangement for antigenicity and stimulation of the immune response. Codon usage was optimized for expression in tobacco plant, under the control of promoter CaMV35S in plasmid pBI121. CCL was efficiently expressed in tobacco hairy roots to yield 1.11% soluble protein as determined by quantitative ELISA and Western blot. In this study, mice were immunized with purified CCL via the oral and subcutaneous route. Humoral immunity especially mucosal immunity with antigen specific IgG and IgA detected in serum and feces. The ability of CCL to elicit neutralizing antibodies was evaluated in the rabbit ileal loop model, using anti-CCL antibodies derived from immunized mice, and co-incubated with ETEC strains. A decrease in fluid accumulation in the intestinal lumen of rabbit ileal loops challenged with ETEC LT and ST positive strains, correlated with the presence of anti-CCL antibodies capable of toxin neutralization. The ability of these antibodies to neutralize toxin confirmed the recognition of epitopes, either linear or conformational, displayed by the recombinant chimeric protein expressed in transgenic tobacco hairy roots. Transgenic plants containing multivalent immunogenic vaccine candidates have the potential to be used for immunization with protection against gastrointestinal pathogens like ETEC.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161589022000311; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2022.02.010; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85129040008&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35504061; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0161589022000311; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2022.02.010
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know