Comparative analysis of graphene and h-BN nanochannel membranes for confined water purification: Insights into desalination performance through molecular dynamics simulation
Journal of Molecular Liquids, ISSN: 0167-7322, Vol: 389, Page: 122920
2023
- 12Citations
- 7Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Researchers from Sharif University of Technology Report Findings in Nanochannels (Comparative Analysis of Graphene And H-bn Nanochannel Membranes for Confined Water Purification: Insights Into Desalination Performance Through Molecular
2024 JAN 04 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Middle East Daily -- Current study results on Nanotechnology - Nanochannels have been
Article Description
Layer-by-layer assembled graphene and boron nitride membranes are suggested as novel materials for reverse osmosis (RO) desalination applications. However, there is no detailed comparison of their desalination performance. In this study, molecular dynamics (MDs) simulations are used to compare and characterize the separation performance of boron nitride nanochannel (BNNC) and graphene nanochannel (GNC) membranes. For this purpose, the effects of various parameters, such as channel height, applied pressure, ion concentration, and membrane flexibility are considered. Moreover, the dynamic parameters of confined water, including friction coefficient, viscosity and diffusion coefficient are computed to clarify the effects of confined on the water transport properties. Results demonstrate that hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity of nanomaterials directly affect the water permeation through the membrane. In this regard, water permeation through GNC is generally higher than BNNC due to less friction against the water molecules. Furthermore, distance between layers of 7.675 Å can be considered as an optimum channel height. Additionally, in the GNC membrane, size exclusion is the main mechanism of ion rejection; On the contrary, in the BNNC membrane, both size exclusion and electrostatic interactions are involved in ion rejection. Overall, this study highlights how different 2D materials have different characteristics and how these characteristics affect desalination performance.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167732223017257; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2023.122920; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85168805398&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167732223017257; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2023.122920
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know