How to perform a neurological examination
Medicine, ISSN: 1357-3039, Vol: 51, Issue: 8, Page: 531-533
2023
- 17Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
Review Description
The neurological examination should be focused on the clinical history and seen as a means of testing the hypotheses generated while listening to the patient. However, pursuing the classically taught systematic interrogation of the neurological hierarchy is seldom necessary and sometimes impractical. A rapid screening neurological assessment should be used in all cases where it is possible, focusing on detecting high-yield clinical anomalies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1357303923001111; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2023.05.004; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85163474482&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1357303923001111; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2023.05.004
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know