Diffusion kurtosis imaging does not improve differentiation performance of breast lesions in a short clinical protocol
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, ISSN: 0730-725X, Vol: 63, Page: 205-216
2019
- 18Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- 18
- CrossRef12
- Captures18
- Readers18
- 18
Article Description
Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) is known to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions via the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Here, the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) for differentiation and further characterization of benign and malignant breast lesions and their subtypes in a clinically feasible protocol is investigated. This study included 85 patients (with 68 malignant and 73 benign lesions) who underwent 3 T breast DWI using three b values (50, 750, 1500 s/mm 2 ), with a total measurement time < 5 min. ADC maps were calculated from b values 50, 750 s/mm 2. The diffusion kurtosis model was fitted to the diffusion weighted images, yielding in each lesion the average kurtosis-corrected diffusion coefficient D K and mean kurtosis K. Histopathology was obtained of radiologically suspicious lesions; follow-up scans were used as a standard of reference for benign appearing lesions. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the parameters' diagnostic performance for differentiation of lesion types and grades. The difference in diffusion parameters between subgroups was analysed statistically using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and Kruskal-Wallis test, applying a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing where necessary. ADC, D K and K showed significant differences between malignant and benign lesions ( p < 10 −5 ). All parameters had similar areas under the curve (AUC) (ADC: 0.92, D K : 0.91, K : 0.89) for differentiation of malignant and benign lesions. Sensitivity was highest for ADC (ADC: 0.96, D K : 0.94, K : 0.93), as well as specificity (ADC: 0.85, D K : 0.82, K : 0.82). ADC and D K showed significant differences between tumor histologic grades ( p = 6.8⋅10 −4, p = 6.6 · 10 −5, respectively), whereas K did not ( p = 0.99). All three parameters differed significantly between subtypes of benign lesions (ADC: p < 10 −5, D K : p < 10 −5, K : p = 4.1·10 −4 ), but not between subtypes of malignant lesions (ADC: p = 0.21, D K : p = 0.25, K : p = 0.08). DKI parameters and conventional ADC can differentiate between malignant and benign lesions. Differentiation performance was best for ADC. Different tumor grades were significantly different in ADC and D K, which may have an impact on therapy planning and monitoring. In our study, K did not add value to the diagnostic performance of DWI in a clinical setting.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X19303273; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2019.08.007; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85071087958&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31425816; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0730725X19303273; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2019.08.007
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know