Enhancement in the inherent photostability of small molecule-based BHJ device by molecular architecturing
Materials Science and Engineering: B, ISSN: 0921-5107, Vol: 283, Page: 115841
2022
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Three small molecules of D-A-D architecture were synthesized with benzothiadiazole as basic acceptor unit. It has been showed previously that the fluorination on the benzothiadiazole acceptor moiety and incorporation of fused thienothiophene spacer have increased the photovoltaic properties [1]. Hence the same strategies have applied here on small molecules to study both the photovoltaic and to tailor the inherent photostability of the material. The first small molecule, TBT (4,7-di(thiophen-2-yl)benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole) was designed with benzothiadiazole- acceptor, and thiophene moiety as the donor unit. The effect of fluorine substitution (TDFBT- 5,6-difluoro-4,7-di(thiophen-2-yl) benzo [c][1,2,5]thiadiazole) and incorporation of fused donor moiety (TTBTT- 4,7-bis(thieno[3,2-b] thiophene-2-yl) benzo [c][1,2,5]thiadiazole) on the optical electrochemical, photovoltaic and photostability of the molecules were evaluated. The photostability study on the structurally modified molecules and blend with PCBM shows promising results. Structural modifications of the p-type molecules exhibit an improved photostability of neat films by significantly. The photostability of the active layer comprised of small molecule- PCBM blend has increased by >13.8 times on incorporation of fused thienothiophene (TTBTT) and by a factor of >5.2 on fluorination of acceptor (TDFBT). The results suggest that the structural modification p-type materials not only improve the optical, electrochemical and photovoltaic properties, but also the photostability of BHJ active layer. A careful selection of p-type materials with increased electron affinity with a sensible balancing with ambient stability and band edge matching with that of the n-type material would lead to stable photovoltaic devices.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921510722002343; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2022.115841; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85133409794&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0921510722002343; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2022.115841
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know