Machine learning-driven gas concentration forecasting: A case study with WS 2 nanoflower gas sensor
Materials Science and Engineering: B, ISSN: 0921-5107, Vol: 307, Page: 117455
2024
- 1Citations
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
Article Description
One approach to effectively forecast gas concentrations is to integrate machine learning techniques with gas-sensitive signals. In this work, the synthesis of two-dimensional nanoflower-like WS 2 was achieved through control of reaction conditions, such as hydrothermal time and temperature, accompanied by an analysis of the formation mechanism underlying the nanoflower-like morphology. At room temperature, the WS 2 nanoflower exhibited a notable response value of 51.61 % towards 100 ppm NH 3. Subsequently, variations in the response of WS 2 to NH 3 were examined under diverse conditions. Two methodologies were employed for parameter extraction and transient signal analysis to construct the eigenvector. Accurate prediction of NH 3 concentration was achieved using four machine learning models, namely ANN, DT, LR and RF. Notably, the RF model exhibited prediction accuracy of 92 % and 84 % for two distinct vectors. By employing parameter, the accurate forecasting of NH 3 concentration was facilitated, broadening the temperature range applicable to the WS 2 gas sensor.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921510724002848; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2024.117455; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85195174087&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0921510724002848; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2024.117455
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know