Construction of 3D-Bioprinted cartilage-mimicking substitute based on photo-crosslinkable Wharton's jelly bioinks for full-thickness articular cartilage defect repair
Materials Today Bio, ISSN: 2590-0064, Vol: 21, Page: 100695
2023
- 12Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Article Description
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinted cartilage-mimicking substitutes for full-thickness articular cartilage defect repair have emerged as alternatives to in situ defect repair models. However, there has been very limited breakthrough in cartilage regeneration based on 3D bioprinting owing to the lack of ideal bioinks with printability, biocompatibility, bioactivity, and suitable physicochemical properties. In contrast to animal-derived natural polymers or acellular matrices, human-derived Wharton's jelly is biocompatible and hypoimmunogenic with an abundant source. Although acellular Wharton's jelly can mimic the chondrogenic microenvironment, it remains challenging to prepare both printable and biologically active bioinks from this material. Here, we firstly prepared methacryloyl-modified acellular Wharton's jelly ( AWJMA ) using a previously established photo-crosslinking strategy. Subsequently, we combined methacryloyl-modified gelatin with AWJMA to obtain a hybrid hydrogel that exhibited both physicochemical properties and biological activities that were suitable for 3D bioprinting. Moreover, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-loaded 3D-bioprinted cartilage-mimicking substitutes had superior advantages for the survival, proliferation, spreading, and chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, which enabled satisfactory repair of a model of full-thickness articular cartilage defect in the rabbit knee joint. The current study provides a novel strategy based on 3D bioprinting of cartilage-mimicking substitutes for full-thickness articular cartilage defect repair.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590006423001552; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100695; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85162064577&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37384040; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2590006423001552; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100695
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know