3D puzzle-inspired construction of large and complex organ structures for tissue engineering
Materials Today Bio, ISSN: 2590-0064, Vol: 21, Page: 100726
2023
- 2Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Captures23
- Readers23
- 23
Article Description
3D printing as a powerful technology enables the fabrication of organ structures with a programmed geometry, but it is usually difficult to produce large-size tissues due to the limited working space of the 3D printer and the instability of bath or ink materials during long printing sessions. Moreover, most printing only allows preparation with a single ink, while a real organ generally consists of multiple materials. Inspired by the 3D puzzle toy, we developed a “building block-based printing” strategy, through which the preparation of 3D tissues can be realized by assembling 3D-printed “small and simple” bio-blocks into “large and complex” bioproducts. The structures that are difficult to print by conventional 3D printing such as a picture puzzle consisting of different materials and colors, a collagen “soccer” with a hollow yet closed structure, and even a full-size human heart model are successfully prepared. The 3D puzzle-inspired preparation strategy also allows for a reasonable combination of various cells in a specified order, facilitating investigation into the interaction between different kinds of cells. This strategy opens an alternative path for preparing organ structures with multiple materials, large size and complex geometry for tissue engineering applications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590006423001862; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100726; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85165950062&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37545564; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2590006423001862; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100726
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know