Construction of evidence-based practice competencies for nurses in China: A modified Delphi study
Nurse Education Today, ISSN: 0260-6917, Vol: 102, Page: 104927
2021
- 22Citations
- 51Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef12
- Captures51
- Readers51
- 51
Article Description
Evidence-based practice is considered as the core competency requirement for nursing practice internationally. However, there is limited information regarding the evidence-based practice competency indicators for clinical nurses in China. To establish a set of evidence-based practice competencies specific to nurses in China. A modified Delphi study. The study was mainly conducted in a university-affiliated hospital in China. Twenty experts with evidence-based practice knowledge or practical experience from different regions and organizations in China. A literature review was conducted to develop the initial list of competencies which consisted of 35 items in seven domains. A two-round Delphi survey used email to invite experts to rate the importance of each item and provide qualitative comments on their ratings. Consensus was predefined as a mean score is of 4.0 or above and at least 75% agreement among the participants. In round 1, 2 items were excluded, 5 items were added, and 12 items were required to be modified. In round 2, the consensus was achieved on 34 items in seven domains. The study established a comprehensive set of evidence-based practice competencies for nurses in China, which provides benchmark standards for the assessment and training of nurses on evidence-based practice.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691721001842; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104927; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85105078982&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33957395; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0260691721001842; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104927
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know