Effects of cooperative learning and situational simulation on nursing competence in clinical practice among nursing students: A quasi-experimental study
Nurse Education Today, ISSN: 0260-6917, Vol: 144, Page: 106464
2025
- 31Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures31
- Readers31
- 31
Article Description
Appropriate cooperative learning and situational simulation designs can enhance mental health and nursing competence in clinical practice. This approach is crucial for cultivating the clinical nursing competence of nursing students. To determine the effect of combining cooperative learning and situational simulation on nursing competence in clinical practice. A quasi-experimental study. This study was conducted with 142 second-year students in the nursing department of a university in Taiwan. The experimental group received cooperative learning combined with situational simulation methods, while the control group used only cooperative learning methods. Data were collected using the Clinical Practice Stress Scale and the Fundamental Nursing Competence Scale. Percentiles and frequency distributions were used to analyze the data, and independent t -tests were conducted to compare differences between the groups. There were no significant differences in descriptive characteristics between the groups ( p > .05). Post-test measurements of nursing technical performance, total score on the fundamental nursing competence scale and six sub-dimensional scores of the students in the experimental group were significantly improved compared to the control group ( p < .001). However, there were no significant differences in total clinical practice stress scale scores between the groups ( p > .05). Interestingly, the knowledge score of the control group was significantly higher than that of the experimental group ( p < .05). The combined methods of cooperative learning and situational simulation have been shown to positively impact students' academic and nursing technical performance. The results indicate improvements in nursing competence in clinical practice, with signs of a reduction in clinical practice-related stress. Nurse educators can apply these strategies in clinical nursing education to achieve better outcomes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724003745; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106464; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85206995183&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39447281; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0260691724003745
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know