Midwifery curricula inclusion of sexual and reproductive health in crisis settings in the Democratic Republic of Congo
Nurse Education in Practice, ISSN: 1471-5953, Vol: 55, Page: 103173
2021
- 6Citations
- 50Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef1
- Captures50
- Readers50
- 50
Article Description
This discussion paper aims to argue for the inclusion of the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health in crisis settings in all midwifery curricula. The Democratic Republic of Congo continues to experience long-standing humanitarian crises that have affected the population’s health, especially in relation to sexual violence and other sexual and reproductive health issues. The MISP was established in 1996 to meet the most vital sexual and reproductive health needs of crisis-affected populations and has become an international minimum standard in humanitarian response. Case study. This paper is a case presentation describing the process and lessons learned related to the introduction of the MISP into the first- and third-year pre-service midwifery curricula at multiple midwifery education facilities in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Six main lessons were identified during the initial implementation phases of the revised midwifery curricula: seizing the opportunity to influence long-term change, engaging teamwork, addressing instructors’ concerns, mobilizing resources for curriculum implementation, assessing school infrastructure readiness during field visits, and meeting immediate humanitarian needs with in-service training. The lessons learned may assist other nations experiencing humanitarian crises with the implementation of the MISP. This pre-service training strategy holds promise for both a sustainable and prompt solution to bridge the gap in competent human resources to deliver quality sexual and reproductive health services in humanitarian settings.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595321002092; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103173; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85112543111&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34411878; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1471595321002092; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103173
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know