Teaching nursing students: As an umbrella review of the effectiveness of using high-fidelity simulation
Nurse Education in Practice, ISSN: 1471-5953, Vol: 77, Page: 103969
2024
- 3Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- Captures28
- Readers28
- 28
Review Description
To conduct an umbrella review of the effectiveness of using high-fidelity simulation in nursing student teaching, thereby supporting continuous improvement in teaching practitioners' implementation of high-fidelity simulation intervention strategies. Several systematic reviews have investigated the effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation in nursing student teaching in recent years. However, conclusions vary and a systematic assessment is lacking. This review encompasses an umbrella review. A search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and OVID databases was conducted to retrieve data on an umbrella review of high-fidelity simulation effectiveness in nursing student teaching from database inception to November 2023. The quality of the included systematic reviews was independently assessed by two reviewers using the AMSTAR 2 and PRISMA scales. Outcome indicators from the included systematic reviews were graded using the GRADE system. Twelve systematic reviews focusing on high-fidelity simulation effectiveness in nursing student teaching were included. Notably, all 12 systematic reviews exhibited very-low methodological quality, with 9 exhibiting some degree of reporting deficiencies, 2 exhibiting severe information deficiencies and 1 reporting relatively complete information. A total of 22 outcome indicators and 53 pieces of evidence were included. The results revealed 15 pieces of low-quality evidence and 38 pieces of very-low-quality evidence. Mounting evidence suggests that high-fidelity simulation teaching effectively enhances nursing students' theoretical performance, practical skills and various clinical comprehensive abilities, highlighting a positive teaching effect. However, further validation through high-quality, large-sample studies is warranted. The overall evidence quality of the current systematic reviews evaluating high-fidelity simulation effectiveness in nursing student teaching is low. Additionally, the methodological quality and the degree of reporting standardization require further improvement. Therefore, high-quality, large-sample randomized controlled trials are essential for further substantiating high-fidelity simulation effectiveness in nursing student teaching.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324000982; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103969; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85190750109&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38642526; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1471595324000982; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103969
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know