Experimental examination on physical and radiation shielding features of boro-silicate glasses doped with varying amounts of BaO
Nuclear Engineering and Technology, ISSN: 1738-5733, Vol: 56, Issue: 8, Page: 3378-3384
2024
- 8Citations
- 10Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
New Findings Reported from Isra University Describe Advances in Nuclear Engineering (Experimental examination on physical and radiation shielding features of boro-silicate glasses doped with varying amounts of BaO)
2024 AUG 12 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Engineering Daily News -- Investigators publish new report on nuclear engineering. According to
Article Description
Investigations were conducted on the addition of barium's impact on the radiation shielding and physical attributes of five different glasses, designated S1–S5, with varying BaO contents. Using two point sources namely Co 60 and Cs 137 along with a scintillation detector [NaI(TL)], experimental measurements were made of the shielding parameters of γ-rays, namely the effective atomic number (Z eff ), electron density (N el ), half-value layer (HVL), linear attenuation coefficient (μ), mass attenuation coefficient (μ m ), mean free path (λ), and radiation protection effectiveness at the energies of 0.664, 1.177, and 1.334 MeV, and comparisons made with recently considered glasses as well as frequently employed materials for γ-ray shielding. The results show that the examined glasses' physical and radiation shielding qualities are improved by the addition of BaO. The μ values increased from 0.245 to 0.275 cm −1 (0.662 MeV), from 0.174 to 0.198 cm −1 (1.173 MeV), and from 0.161 to 0.189 (1.332 MeV). The observed values of HVL decreased from 2.83, 3.98, and 4.3 cm to 2.5, 3.5, and 3.62 cm at 0.662, 1.173, and 1.332 MeV, respectively, for the samples S1 and S5. In addition, the S5 glass sample was determined to have the best protection against photon among all the samples that were evaluated, as well as against recently considered glasses and those materials often utilized for gamma-ray shielding purposes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573324001578; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2024.03.038; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85189682786&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1738573324001578; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2024.03.038
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know