How the brain connects in response to acute stress: A review at the human brain systems level
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, ISSN: 0149-7634, Vol: 83, Page: 281-297
2017
- 171Citations
- 343Captures
- 21Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations171
- Citation Indexes169
- CrossRef169
- 166
- Policy Citations2
- Policy Citation2
- Captures343
- Readers343
- 343
- Mentions21
- News Mentions20
- News20
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Most Recent News
5 reasons to let students keep their cameras off during Zoom classes
A researcher who studies behavior and the brain makes the case for why giving kids the option to turn off their camera is the right thing to do. As the 2020-21 school year gets underway—both at the K-12 and college level—many students find themselves attending online classes via Zoom or similar teleconferencing platforms. Read Full Story
Review Description
The brain's response to stress is a matter of extensive neurocognitive research in an attempt to unravel the mechanistic underpinnings of neural adaptation. In line with the broadly defined concept of acute stress, a wide variety of induction procedures are used to mimic stress experimentally. We set out to review commonalities and diversities of the stress-related functional activity and connectivity changes of functional brain networks in healthy adults across procedures. The acute stress response is consistently associated with both increased activity and connectivity in the salience network (SN) and surprisingly also with increased activity in the default mode network (DMN), while most studies show no changes in the central executive network. These results confirm earlier findings of an essential, coordinating role of the SN in the acute stress response and indicate a dynamic role of the DMN whose function is less clear. Moreover, paradigm specific brain responses have to be taken into account when investigating the role and the within and between network connectivity of these three networks.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763417303275; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.015; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85032743241&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29074385; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0149763417303275; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.015
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know