Prognostic factors for progression-free survival of the filum terminale ependymomas in adults
Neurochirurgie, ISSN: 0028-3770, Vol: 68, Issue: 3, Page: 273-279
2022
- 4Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
To define the prognostic factors for progression and to determine the impact of the histological grading (according to the World Health Organization) on the progression-free survival (PFS) of filum terminale ependymomas. A retrospective chart review of 38 patients with ependymoma of the filum terminale was performed, focusing on demographic data, preoperative symptoms, tumor size, quality of resection, presence of a tumor capsule, and histological grade. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 30 patients (78.9%). Histopathological analysis found 21 (55.3%) myxopapillary grade I ependymoma (MPE), 16 (42.1%) ependymoma grade II (EGII), and 1 (2.6%) ependymoma grade III. There was no significant difference between the mean ± SD volume of MPE (5840.5 ± 5244.2 mm 3 ) and the one of EGII (7220.3 ± 6305.9 mm 3, p = 0.5). The mean ± SD follow-up was 54.1 ± 38.4 months. At last follow-up, 30 (78.9%) patients were free of progression. In multivariate analysis, subtotal resection ( p = 0.015) and infiltrative tumor ( p = 0.03) were significantly associated with progression. The PFS was significantly higher in patients with encapsulated tumor than in patients with infiltrative tumor (log-rank p = 0.01) and in patients who had a GTR in comparison with those who had an incomplete resection (log-rank p = 0.05). There was no difference in PFS between patient with MPE and EGII ( p = 0.1). The progression of ependymoma of the filum terminale highly depends on the quality of resection, and whether the tumor is encapsulated. Except for anaplastic grade, histopathological type does not influence progression.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028377021002666; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2021.12.006; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85123110730&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34998798; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0028377021002666; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2021.12.006
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know