Active label distribution learning
Neurocomputing, ISSN: 0925-2312, Vol: 436, Page: 12-21
2021
- 7Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Label Distribution Learning (LDL) is a new learning paradigm to describe supervision as probability distribution and has been successfully applied in many real-world scenarios in recent years. In LDL applications, the availability of a large amount of labeled data guarantees the prediction performance. In this paper, we cogitate the active learning for LDL to reduce the annotation cost. The center element in practice any active learning strategy is building the criterion that measures the usefulness of the unlabeled data and decides the instances to be selected to label manually. We are probably the first to focus on active instance selecting for label distribution learning. We propose a strategy named Active Label Distribution Learning (ALDL) to select the most informative instances for LDL applications. The fundamental idea of the ALDL strategy is to quantify the degree of disagreement for each unlabeled instance by the committee consisted of selected LDL algorithms, and identify the instances to be labeled manually. ALDL maintains composing the committee with selected LDL algorithms and measure the value of unlabeled instances, and a weight vector is used both parts. Besides, we discuss the convergence and the parameter selecting of ALDL. Finally, compared with other active learning methods, the experimental results on the datasets show the effectiveness of our method.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231220320464; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.12.128; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85100171643&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925231220320464; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.12.128
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know