Accurate iris segmentation and recognition using an end-to-end unified framework based on MADNet and DSANet
Neurocomputing, ISSN: 0925-2312, Vol: 517, Page: 264-278
2023
- 75Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Due to their insufficient generalization ability, iris segmentation algorithms based on deep learning cannot accurately segment iris images without corresponding ground truth (GT) data. Moreover, prior to recognition, the segmented image requires normalization to reduce the influence of pupil deformation. However, normalization of nonconnected iris regions will introduce noise, thereby decreasing the recognition rate. This paper proposes an end-to-end unified framework based on deep learning that does not include normalization in order to achieve improved accuracy in iris segmentation and recognition. In this framework, a multiattention dense connection network (MADNet) and dense spatial attention network (DSANet) are designed for iris segmentation and recognition, respectively. Finally, numerous ablation experiments are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of MADNet and DSANet. Experiments on three employed databases show that our proposed method achieves the best segmentation and recognition performance on low-quality iris images without corresponding GT data.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231222013455; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.10.064; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85141518862&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925231222013455; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.10.064
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know