Revisiting the relationship between neural correlates of sensory gating and self-reported sensory gating inventory: An MEG investigation
Neuroscience Letters, ISSN: 0304-3940, Vol: 766, Page: 136336
2022
- 1Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
Accumulated evidence has revealed that bilateral superior temporal gyrus (STG), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and inferior parietal lobule (IPL) are involved in the processes of sensory gating (SG). However, it remains unknown which neural correlate(s) of SG specifically reflect individuals’ perceptual experiences, as measured by the Sensory Gating Inventory (SGI). Thus, this study aims to investigate the relationship of SGI with cortical SG-related regions. Furthermore, we examine whether SG hemispheric asymmetry exists, which is still an inconclusive issue. Twenty-two healthy young adults performed the auditory paired-stimulus paradigm during magnetoencephalographic recordings. SG of M50 and M100 was measured as ratios (S2/S1) and differences (S1–S2). They were also evaluated with SGI, which factored into three categories of Perceptual Modulation, Distractibility, and Over-Inclusion. SG in the STG, IFG, and IPL were compared between left and right hemispheres, and were used to determine the relationship with SGI. Only M100 SG differences (S1–S2) of the right IFG were significantly correlated with scores of Perceptual Modulation (partial r = -0.392, p = 0.040) and total SGI scores (partial r = -0.387, p = 0.041). However, we did not find significant lateralization of M50 SG and M100 SG in any studying region. The individual’s perceptual experience is specifically related to electrophysiological SG function of the right IFG.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304394021007151; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136336; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85118839625&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34758341; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304394021007151; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136336
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know