Open-world electrocardiogram classification via domain knowledge-driven contrastive learning
Neural Networks, ISSN: 0893-6080, Vol: 179, Page: 106551
2024
- 1Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Automatic electrocardiogram (ECG) classification provides valuable auxiliary information for assisting disease diagnosis and has received much attention in research. The success of existing classification models relies on fitting the labeled samples for every ECG type. However, in practice, well-annotated ECG datasets usually cover only limited ECG types. It thus raises an issue: conventional classification models trained with limited ECG types can only identify those ECG types that have already been observed in the training set, but fail to recognize unseen (or unknown) ECG types that exist in the wild and are not included in training data. In this work, we investigate an important problem called open-world ECG classification that can predict fine-grained observed ECG classes and identify unseen classes. Accordingly, we propose a customized method that first incorporates clinical knowledge into contrastive learning by generating “hard negative” samples to guide learning diagnostic ECG features (i.e., distinguishable representations), and then performs multi-hypersphere learning to learn compact ECG representations for classification. The experiment results on 12-lead ECG datasets (CPSC2018, PTB-XL, and Georgia) demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. Specifically, our method achieves superior accuracy than the comparative methods on the unseen ECG class and certain seen classes. Overall, the investigated problem (i.e., open-world ECG classification) helps to draw attention to the reliability of automatic ECG diagnosis, and the proposed method is proven effective in tackling the challenges. The code and datasets are released at https://github.com/betterzhou/Open_World_ECG_Classification.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0893608024004751; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106551; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85199571528&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39068675; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0893608024004751
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know