Intraparietal sulcus maintains working memory representations of somatosensory categories in an adaptive, context-dependent manner
NeuroImage, ISSN: 1053-8119, Vol: 221, Page: 117146
2020
- 7Citations
- 32Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef3
- Captures32
- Readers32
- 32
Article Description
Working memory (WM) representations are generally known to be influenced by task demands, but it is not clear whether this extends to the somatosensory domain. One way to investigate the influence of task demands is with categorization paradigms, wherein either a single stimulus or an associated category is maintained in WM. In the somatosensory modality, category representations have been identified in the premotor cortex (PMC) and the intraparietal sulcus (IPS). In this study we used multivariate-pattern-analysis with human fMRI data to investigate whether the WM representations in the PMC, IPS or other regions are influenced by changing task demands. We ensured the task-dependent, categorical WM information was decorrelated from stimulus features by (1) teaching participants arbitrary, non-rule based stimulus groupings and (2) contrasting identical pairs of stimuli across experimental conditions, where either a single stimulus or the associated group was maintained in WM. Importantly, we also decoupled the decision and motor output from the WM representations. With these experimental manipulations, we were able to pinpoint stimulus-specific WM information to the left frontal and parietal cortices and context-dependent, group-specific WM information to the left IPS. By showing that grouped stimuli are represented more similarly in the Group condition than in the Stimulus condition, free from stimulus and motor output confounds, we provide novel evidence for the adaptive nature of somatosensory WM representations in the IPS with changing task-demands.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920306327; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117146; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85088222011&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32659356; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811920306327; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117146
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know