Higher intracranial arterial pulsatility is associated with presumed imaging markers of the glymphatic system: An explorative study
NeuroImage, ISSN: 1053-8119, Vol: 288, Page: 120524
2024
- 9Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
Arterial pulsation has been suggested as a key driver of paravascular cerebrospinal fluid flow, which is the foundation of glymphatic clearance. However, whether intracranial arterial pulsatility is associated with glymphatic markers in humans has not yet been studied. Seventy-three community participants were enrolled in the study. 4D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to quantify the hemodynamic parameters including flow pulsatility index (PI flow ) and area pulsatility index (PI area ) from 13 major intracerebral arterial segments. Three presumed neuroimaging markers of the glymphatic system were measured: including dilation of perivascular space (PVS), diffusivity along the perivascular space (ALPS), and volume fraction of free water (FW) in white matter. We explored the relationships between PI area, PI flow, and the presumed glymphatic markers, controlling for related covariates. PI flow in the internal carotid artery (ICA) C2 segment (OR, 1.05; 95 % CI, 1.01–1.10, per 0.01 increase in PI) and C4 segment (OR, 1.05; 95 % CI, 1.01–1.09) was positively associated with the dilation of basal ganglia PVS, and PI flow in the ICA C4 segment (OR, 1.06, 95 % CI, 1.02–1.10) was correlated with the dilation of PVS in the white matter. ALPS was associated with PI flow in the basilar artery (β, -0.273, p, 0.046) and PI area in the ICA C2 (β, -0.239, p, 0.041) and C7 segments (β, -0.238, p, 0.037). : Intracranial arterial pulsatility was associated with presumed neuroimaging markers of the glymphatic system, but the results were not consistent across different markers. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811924000193; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120524; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85184047600&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38278428; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811924000193; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120524
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know