Electrophysiological and morphological properties of Cajal–Retzius cells with different ontogenetic origins
Neuroscience, ISSN: 0306-4522, Vol: 167, Issue: 3, Page: 724-734
2010
- 31Citations
- 65Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations31
- Citation Indexes31
- 31
- CrossRef29
- Captures65
- Readers65
- 65
- Mentions2
- References2
- Wikipedia2
Article Description
The different origins of Cajal–Retzius cells (CRc) as well as their diverse molecular profile suggest that this cell type may represent different neuronal subpopulations. In order to investigate whether CRc from different origins show distinct functional or morphological characteristics we used transgenic Dbx1 cre ; ROSA26 YFP mice in which two subpopulations of CRc, originating from the septum and ventral pallium (VP) at the pallial–subpallial border (PSB), were permanently labeled by yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) expression. Electrophysiological properties of YFP + and YFP − CRc were investigated by whole-cell patch-clamp recordings, while a thorough somatodendritic and axonal reconstruction of the biocytin labeled CRc was subsequently performed using a Neurolucida system. Our experiments revealed that no significant differences in resting membrane potential, input resistance or capacitance, hyperpolarization activated currents and most action potentials properties could be observed between YFP + and YFP − CRc. Both YFP + and YFP − CRc displayed spontaneous and carbachol-induced GABAergic postsynaptic currents with similar properties and comparable NMDA-receptor mediated glutamatergic inward currents that were equally affected by the NR2B specific antagonist ifenprodil. Morphological reconstructions revealed that dendritic and axonal parameters are similar between YFP + and YFP − CRc, while the dendritic compartment of YFP + CRc was slightly larger. In summary, no considerable differences in functional and morphological properties between YFP + and YFP − CRc could be observed in this study. These observations suggest that CRc of different ontogenic origins display comparable functional properties in the early postnatal cortex and therefore perform similar functions within the transient neuronal networks of the developing cortex.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030645221000271X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.02.043; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77951298323&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20188149; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S030645221000271X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.02.043
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know