Biomaterial Cues to Direct a Pro-regenerative Phenotype in Macrophages and Schwann Cells
Neuroscience, ISSN: 0306-4522, Vol: 376, Page: 172-187
2018
- 18Citations
- 47Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- 18
- CrossRef14
- Captures47
- Readers47
- 47
Article Description
Following peripheral nerve injury (PNI), inflammatory cues impede repair. We have previously demonstrated that spinal cord matrix (SCM) proteins and hyaluronic acid (HA) nanofibers mitigate chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG) inhibition and promote growth in peripheral neurons. In this study, we evaluated the effects of a characteristic CSPG, chondroitin sulfate A (CSA), SCM, and HA fibers on macrophages and Schwann cells (SCs). We hypothesized that our cues would accelerate the macrophages’ return to rest following classical activation (M1/pro-inflammatory) with lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 1 μg/mL) and would accelerate the transformation of SCs from an immature state following injury to a mature/pro-myelinating phenotype. LPS stimulation of the macrophages caused upregulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS; M1 gene) and led to significantly increased cell area and decreased circularity. However, the SCM and HA nanofibers mitigated this effect, significantly reducing iNOS expression. SCs on the fibers had significantly reduced area and increased elongation. These morphological changes may have polarized the cells leading to decreased GFAP (immature gene) and increased Oct6 and Krox 20 (promyelin genes) expression. Antibody arrays were used to measure relative levels of inflammatory cytokines released by the cells. The arrays confirmed that anti-inflammatory cytokines are released from the cells when cultured with our biomaterial cues and helped identify targets for future investigation including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin (IL)-10, monocyte colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) from the macrophages, Agrin, ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), tissue inhibitor metalloproteinases (TIMPs)-1 from SCs, and IL-2 from both cell types. In conclusion, these results suggest that our biomaterial cues have pro-regenerative effects on both cell types and if combined may trigger cells toward regenerative programs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452218301325; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.02.015; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85043266548&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29462706; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306452218301325; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.02.015
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know