Differences in Startle and Prepulse Inhibition in Contactin-associated Protein-like 2 Knock-out Rats are Associated with Sex-specific Alterations in Brainstem Neural Activity
Neuroscience, ISSN: 0306-4522, Vol: 513, Page: 96-110
2023
- 5Citations
- 65Usage
- 14Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- Usage65
- Downloads60
- Abstract Views5
- Captures14
- Readers14
- 14
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Findings from University of Western Ontario Broaden Understanding of Life Science (Differences In Startle and Prepulse Inhibition In Contactin-associated Protein-like 2 Knock-out Rats Are Associated With Sex-specific Alterations In Brainstem ...)
2023 MAY 09 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Genomics & Genetics Daily -- Investigators publish new report on Life Science. According
Article Description
The contactin-associated protein-like 2 ( CNTNAP2 ) gene encodes for the CASPR2 protein, which plays an essential role in neurodevelopment. Mutations in CNTNAP2 are associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia. Rats with a loss of function mutation in the Cntnap2 gene show increased acoustic startle response (ASR) and decreased prepulse inhibition (PPI). The neural basis of this altered auditory processing in Cntnap2 knock-out rats is currently unknown. Auditory brainstem recordings previously revealed no differences between the genotypes. The next step is to investigate brainstem structures outside of the primary auditory pathway that mediate ASR and PPI, which are the pontine reticular nucleus (PnC) and pedunculopontine tegmentum (PPTg), respectively. Multi-unit responses from the PnC and PPTg in vivo of the same rats revealed sex-specific effects of loss of CASPR2 expression on PnC activity, but no effects on PPTg activity. Female Cntnap2−/− rats showed considerably increased PnC firing rates compared with female wildtypes, whereas the difference between the genotypes was modest in male rats. In contrast, for both females and males we found meager differences between the genotypes for PPTg firing rates and inhibition of PnC firing rates, indicating that altered firing rates of these brainstem structures are not responsible for decreased PPI in Cntnap2−/− rats. We conclude that the auditory processing changes seen in Cntnap2−/− rats are associated with, but cannot be fully explained by, differences in PnC firing rates, and that a loss of function mutation in the Cntnap2 gene has differential effects depending on sex.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452223000313; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.01.020; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85147566862&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36708798; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306452223000313; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/anatomypub/347; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1357&context=anatomypub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.01.020
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know