Explaining supernova remnant G352.7-0.1 as a peculiar type Ia supernova inside a planetary nebula
New Astronomy, ISSN: 1384-1076, Vol: 109, Page: 102213
2024
- 1Citations
- 5Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Studies from Technion-Israel Institute of Technology Have Provided New Information about Mergers and Acquisitions (Explaining Supernova Remnant G352.7-0.1 As a Peculiar Type Ia Supernova Inside a Planetary Nebula)
2024 JUL 02 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Middle East Daily -- Fresh data on Mergers and Acquisitions are presented in
Article Description
I identify a point-symmetric morphology of the supernova remnant (SNR) G352.7-0.1 and propose that the outer axially-symmetric structure is the remnant of a common envelope evolution (CEE) of the progenitor system, while the inner structure is the ejecta of a thermonuclear explosion triggered by the merger of a white dwarf (WD) and the core of an asymptotic giant branch (AGB) star. The main radio structure of SNR G352.7-0.1 forms an outer (large) ellipse. The bright X-ray emitting gas forms a smaller ellipse with a symmetry axis inclined to the symmetry axis of the large radio ellipse. The high abundance of iron and the energy of its X-ray lines suggest a type Ia supernova (SN Ia). The massive swept-up gas suggests a relatively massive progenitor system. I propose a scenario with progenitors of initial masses of MZAMS,1≃5–7M⊙ and MZAMS,2≃4–5M⊙. At a later phase, the WD remnant of the primary star and the AGB secondary star experience a CEE that ejects the circumstellar material that swept up more ISM to form the large elliptical radio structure. An explosion during the merger of the WD with the core of the AGB star triggered a super-Chandrasekhar thermonuclear explosion that formed the inner structure that is bright in X-ray. A tertiary star in the system caused the misalignment of the two symmetry axes. This study adds to the wide variety of evolutionary routes within the scenarios of normal and peculiar SNe Ia.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1384107624000277; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2024.102213; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85186505171&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1384107624000277; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2024.102213
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know