Mapping spoken language and cognitive deficits in post-stroke aphasia
NeuroImage: Clinical, ISSN: 2213-1582, Vol: 39, Page: 103452
2023
- 9Citations
- 39Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef1
- Captures39
- Readers39
- 39
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Researchers from University College London (UCL) Discuss Research in Aphasia (Mapping spoken language and cognitive deficits in post-stroke aphasia)
2023 JUN 30 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Genomics & Genetics Daily -- Research findings on aphasia are discussed in a
Article Description
Aphasia is an acquired disorder caused by damage, most commonly due to stroke, to brain regions involved in speech and language. While language impairment is the defining symptom of aphasia, the co-occurrence of non-language cognitive deficits and their importance in predicting rehabilitation and recovery outcomes is well documented. However, people with aphasia (PWA) are rarely tested on higher-order cognitive functions, making it difficult for studies to associate these functions with a consistent lesion correlate. Broca’s area is a particular brain region of interest that has long been implicated in speech and language production. Contrary to classic models of speech and language, cumulative evidence shows that Broca’s area and surrounding regions in the left inferior frontal cortex (LIFC) are involved in, but not specific to, speech production. In this study we aimed to explore the brain-behaviour relationships between tests of cognitive skill and language abilities in thirty-six adults with long-term speech production deficits caused by post-stroke aphasia. Our findings suggest that non-linguistic cognitive functions, namely executive functions and verbal working memory, explain more of the behavioural variance in PWA than classical language models imply. Additionally, lesions to the LIFC, including Broca’s area, were associated with non-linguistic executive (dys)function, suggesting that lesions to this area are associated with non-language-specific higher-order cognitive deficits in aphasia. Whether executive (dys)function – and its neural correlate in Broca’s area – contributes directly to PWA’s language production deficits or simply co-occurs with it, adding to communication difficulties, remains unclear. These findings support contemporary models of speech production that place language processing within the context of domain-general perception, action and conceptual knowledge. An understanding of the covariance between language and non-language deficits and their underlying neural correlates will inform better targeted aphasia treatment and outcomes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158223001419; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103452; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85162178031&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37321143; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213158223001419; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103452
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know