Systematic investigation of critical charge limits in Thick GEMs
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, ISSN: 0168-9002, Vol: 1047, Page: 167730
2023
- 4Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We present discharge probability studies performed with a single Thick Gas Electron Multiplier (THGEM) irradiated with alpha particles in Ar-CO 2 and Ne-CO 2 mixtures. We observe a clear dependency of the discharge stability on the noble gas and quencher content pointing to lighter gases being more stable against the development of streamer discharges. A detailed comparison of the measurements with Geant4 simulations allowed us to extract the critical charge value leading to the formation of a spark in a THGEM hole, which is found to be within the range of (3 to 7) ×106 electrons, depending on the gas mixture. Our experimental findings are compared to previous GEM results. We show that the discharge probability of THGEMs exceeds the one measured with GEMs by orders of magnitude. This can be explained with simple geometrical considerations, where primary ionization is collected by a lower number of holes available in a THGEM structure, reaching higher primary charge densities and thus increasing the probability of a spark occurrence. However, we show that the critical charge limits are similar for both amplification structures.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900222010221; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2022.167730; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85145594982&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0168900222010221; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2022.167730
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know