An improved lump mass stick model of a nuclear power plant based on the Kriging surrogate model
Nuclear Engineering and Design, ISSN: 0029-5493, Vol: 423, Page: 113182
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
This paper focuses on an improved lump mass stick model of the AP1000 nuclear power plant (NPP). The conventional method is used to calculate the parameters of the lump mass stick (LMS) model of the AP1000 NPP, which has great differences between the LMS model and the finite element (FEM) model in terms of frequency and vibration mode. Therefore, with optimizing the mass condensation size of a shear wall without a floor as a goal, the improved lump mass stick (I-LMS) model based on the Kriging surrogate model is established. The results illustrate that: (i) compared with the LMS model, the relative error of the I-LMS model and the FEM model, the maximum error of the frequency is reduced from 23.04% to 6.57% with nine order frequencies; (ii) the frequencies of the Kriging surrogate model and the I-LMS model are very close, with the largest error being only 1.45%, indicating that the Kriging surrogate model has obtained better correction accuracy; (iii) the modal assurance criterion (MAC) value of the I-LMS model for the same vibration mode is increased from 0.75 to 0.95 to 0.88–0.96, and the MAC values of different vibration modes are closer to 0; and (iv) comparison of the structural dynamic response under basic design earthquake to the FEM model shows that the I-LMS model has good calculation accuracy and obvious advantages in calculation efficiency.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549324002826; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113182; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85189511479&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0029549324002826; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113182
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know