Stakeholder Perspectives on Improving an Advance Practice Provider Emergency Department Critical Care Step-Down Unit
The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, ISSN: 1555-4155, Vol: 17, Issue: 1, Page: 119-122
2021
- 17Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
Article Description
In response to concerns about the continued care and safety of critically ill and injured patients, our academic, urban, tertiary care, level I trauma center adult emergency department (ED) created an advanced practice provider (APP)-staffed critical care step-down unit (CCSU). We conducted semistructured interviews of ED physicians, APPs, and nursing staff about the value added by the CCSU as well as suggestions for its improvement. The results from the interviews showed staff were highly complimentary of the CCSU and recommended expansion of its hours and APP staffing, but indicated areas of improvement. Future research can evaluate how implementation of stakeholder suggestions improved the CCSU’s operations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1555415520304049; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.07.024; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85091712305&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1555415520304049; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1555415520304049?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1555415520304049?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.07.024
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know