Intracranial Stimulation Therapy for Epilepsy
Neurotherapeutics, ISSN: 1878-7479, Vol: 6, Issue: 2, Page: 238-243
2009
- 93Citations
- 105Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations93
- Citation Indexes93
- 93
- CrossRef82
- Captures105
- Readers105
- 105
Article Description
Epilepsy is a common chronic neurological disorder effecting 1 to 2% of the population. Despite advances in anti-epileptic drug therapy, epilepsy surgery, and vagus nerve stimulation, approximately 30% of patients continue to have seizures. Intracranial stimulation is currently under investigation as an adjunctive treatment to anti-epileptic medications in adults with medically intractable epilepsy. Several different approaches are now being investigated. Specifically, acute and long-term clinical studies have delivered stimulation either to inhibitory regions outside the seizure focus or directly to the seizure focus. These studies have demonstrated the safety of intracranial stimulation and proof of principle in epilepsy patients. In addition to the different locations tested, clinical studies have also used different temporal patterns of stimulation. The majority of studies have used open-loop or scheduled stimulation, in which, stimulation is delivered on a fixed schedule and is independent of electrographic activity. In contrast, a number of recent investigations have demonstrated the feasibility of closed-loop or responsive stimulation, which is stimulation that is contingent upon the detection of epileptiform activity. This chapter will review the acute and long-term clinical studies of intracranial stimulation, including focal, and nonfocal, and open-loop and responsive stimulation. We will also discuss the optimization and safety of therapeutic parameters used in neurostimulation for epilepsy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878747923003914; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nurt.2009.01.022; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=62949246675&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19332315; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1878747923003914; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nurt.2009.01.022; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1016/j.nurt.2009.01.022; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1016/j.nurt.2009.01.022
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know