An Online Educational Intervention to Influence Medical and Nurse Practitioner Students’ Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation for Antepartum Depression Screening and Education
Nursing for Women's Health, ISSN: 1751-4851, Vol: 25, Issue: 1, Page: 43-53
2021
- 7Citations
- 122Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes6
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Captures122
- Readers122
- 122
Article Description
To evaluate nurse practitioner and medical students’ knowledge, self-efficacy, and motivation for antepartum depression screening and education before and after an online educational intervention. Quasi-experimental study design. The University of South Florida, College of Nursing and College of Medicine. Historically, nursing and medical school curricula have a focus on postpartum depression. Testing nurse practitioner and medical students regarding maternal depression throughout pregnancy may give insight into curriculum preparedness. Medical and nurse practitioner students were recruited by convenience sampling. In total, 71 participants completed the study. There were 52 (73%) nurse practitioner students and 19 (27%) medical students. Participants used a self-directed learning activity in the form of a slide presentation on the virtual platform REDCap. Knowledge was tested before and after the intervention using the “Speak Up When You’re Down”—Postpartum Depression Awareness Campaign examination. Self-efficacy and motivation were measured before and after the intervention by using the Physician/Nurse Practitioner Student Teaching Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and the Physician/Nurse Practitioner Student Teaching Motivation Questionnaire. Nurse practitioner and medical students exhibited a mean increase in scores for knowledge, self-efficacy, and motivation. Both groups performed similarly from before to after the intervention, and student profession did not moderate the increase from before to after the intervention. An intervention to influence health care students' knowledge, self-efficacy, and motivation for antepartum depression screening can be included in medical and nursing curricula and can also be used with currently practicing health care providers. Doing so could possibly benefit pregnant women by enhancing the antepartum care that they receive.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751485120302099; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2020.11.004; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85100420071&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33460578; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1751485120302099; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2020.11.004
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know