Study of Mo 3 NiB 3 and Mo 2 NiB 2 cermets by first-principles calculation and experiment
Next Materials, ISSN: 2949-8228, Vol: 7, Page: 100324
2025
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
In this work, the mechanical properties of Mo 3 NiB 3 and Mo 2 NiB 2 phases in Mo-Ni-B cermets were studied. The first-principles calculation results demonstrate the thermodynamic and mechanical stability of both Mo 3 NiB 3 and Mo 2 NiB 2. Among them, Mo 2 NiB 2 shows superior stability and toughness compared to Mo 3 NiB 3. On the other hand, the Young’s modulus and hardness values of Mo 3 NiB 3 are higher than those of Mo 2 NiB 2. Mo 3 NiB 3 exhibits enhanced isotropy and stronger covalent bonding properties, as confirmed by DOS and Mulliken analysis. Further research shows that Mo 3 NiB 3 has brittleness (B/G = 1.586) and high Vickers hardness (22.3 GPa), indicating its potential use as a wear-resistant material. To validate the accuracy of the theoretical calculations, Mo 3 NiB 3 and Mo 2 NiB 2 cermets were fabricated through vacuum hot pressing sintering, followed by comprehensive analysis of their microstructure and mechanical properties. Specifically, the experimentally measured compressive strength and hardness values of Mo 3 NiB 3 (3213.2 MPa and 3264.2 HV0.3, respectively) were closely matched by the theoretical predictions. Notably, these experimental findings are in good agreement with the theoretically calculated values. This investigation provides reference value for a more in-depth analysis of the mechanical properties of Mo-Ni-B cermets, provides a theoretical and practical basis for its application in the field of materials, and promotes the development of Mo-Ni-B cermets materials.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949822824002211; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2024.100324; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105000163217&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2949822824002211; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2024.100324
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know