Comparison of Weibull parameter estimation methods using LiDAR and mast wind data in an Indian offshore site: The Gulf of Khambhat
Ocean Engineering, ISSN: 0029-8018, Vol: 266, Page: 112927
2022
- 11Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper gives a proper study of 11 types of Weibull parameters estimation methods and their performance comparison for wind potential assessment on India's first offshore project in the Gulf of Khambhat, Gujarat. The Lidar (up to 200 m) and met mast (up to 100 m) are deployed to record wind data from Nov-2017 to Dec-2019 by the National Institute of Wind Energy (NIWE), Government of India. The estimation methods such as, modified maximum likelihood method (MMLM), maximum likelihood method (MLM), empirical method of Justus (EMJ), empirical method of Lysen (EML), graphical method (GM), first method of moment (MOM-1), second method of moment (MOM-2), third method of moment (MOM-3), alternative maximum likelihood method (AMLM), WAsP or equivalent energy method (EEM), energy pattern factor method (EPFM), found in literature survey are compared to evaluate the performance using statistical methods in the offshore region of India. The mathematical expressions of methods have been coded and implemented by MATLAB software through a proper data analysis. There is a need to explore more appropriate probabilistic distribution than Weibull distribution. The MMLM, MLM, and MOM versions perform nicely, followed by the empirical method of Justus and Lysen. The GM method underperformed and that needs modification.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029801822022107; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112927; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85142366082&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0029801822022107; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112927
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know