Application of artificial intelligence hybrid models in safety assessment of submarine pipelines: Principles and methods
Ocean Engineering, ISSN: 0029-8018, Vol: 312, Page: 119203
2024
- 1Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Submarine pipeline is a critical component for exploiting marine oil and gas resources. The aging of pipelines is becoming increasingly serious, and any damage or rupture can lead to severe marine environmental pollution. Therefore, effective safety assessment methods are crucial for ensuring the safety of submarine pipelines. Traditional safety assessment methods such as Event Tree Analysis (ETA), Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) have been widely used but rely heavily on historical accidents. Artificial intelligence methods, particularly hybrid models, offer a more resilient alternative by combining different techniques, providing more accurate assessments even with limited data. Therefore, this study reviews the application of AI methods in the safety assessment of submarine pipelines, focusing on hybrid models that combine Support Vector Machine (SVM), Bayesian Network (BN), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with other techniques. These hybrid models have shown excellent performance in detecting and predicting corrosion defects in submarine pipelines and overall safety assessment by complementing each other's strengths. Future research should focus on model integration and optimization, revealing the evolution processes of accidents, data augmentation to address data scarcity, interdisciplinary research to enhance model interpretability, and intelligent decision-making for better pipeline integrity management.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know