A multiplicity of environmental, economic and social factor analyses to understand COVID-19 diffusion
One Health, ISSN: 2352-7714, Vol: 13, Page: 100335
2021
- 6Citations
- 32Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef6
- Captures32
- Readers32
- 32
Article Description
Research on the impact of the environment on COVID-19 diffusion lacks a full-comprehensive perspective, and neglecting the multiplicity of the human-environment system can lead to misleading conclusions. We attempted to reveal all pre-existing environmental-to-human and human-to-human determinants that influence the transmission of COVID-19. As such, We estimated the daily case incidence ratios (CIR) of COVID-19 for prefectures across mainland China, and used a mixed-effects mixed-distribution model to study the association between the CIR and 114 factors related to climate, atmospheric environmental quality, terrain, population, economic, human mobility as well as non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs). Not only the changes in determinants over time as the pandemic progresses but also their lag and interaction effects were examined. CO, O 3, PM 10 and PM 2.5 were found positively linked with CIR, but the effect of NO 2 was negative. The temperature had no significant association with CIR, and the daily minimum humidity was a significant negatively predictor. NPIs' level was negatively associated with CIR until with a lag of 15 days. Higher accumulated destination migration scale flow from the epicenter and lower distance to the epicenter ( DisWH ) were associated with a higher CIR, however, the interaction between DisWH and the time was positive. The more economically developed and more densely populated cities have a higher probability of CIR occurrence, but they may not have a higher CIR intensity.The COVID-19 diffusion are caused by a multiplicity of environmental, economic, social factors as well as NPIs. First, multiple pollutants carried simultaneously on particulate matter affect COVID-19 transmission. Second, the temperature has a limited impact on the spread of the epidemic. Third, NPIs must last for at least 15 days or longer before the effect has been apparent. Fourth, the impact of population movement from the epicenter on COVID-19 gradually diminished over time and intraregional migration deserves more attention.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352771421001257; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100335; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120501095&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34632042; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352771421001257; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100335
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know