Branch information extraction from Norway spruce using handheld laser scanning point clouds in Nordic forests
ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, ISSN: 2667-3932, Vol: 9, Page: 100040
2023
- 13Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We showed that a mobile handheld laser scanner (HHLS) provides useful features concerning the wood quality-influencing external structures of trees. When linked with wood properties measured at a sawmill utilizing state-of-the-art X-ray scanners, these data enable the training of various wood quality models for use in targeting and planning future wood procurement. A total of 457 Norway spruce sample trees ( Picea abies (L.) H. Karst.) from 13 spruce-dominated stands in southeastern Finland were used in the study. All test sites were recorded with a ZEB Horizon HHLS, and the sample trees were tracked to a sawmill and subjected to X-rays. Two branch extraction techniques were applied to the HHLS point clouds: 1) a method developed in this study that was based on the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) and 2) segmentation-based quantitative structure model (treeQSM). On average, the treeQSM method detected 46% more branches per tree than the DBSCAN did. However, compared with the X-rayed references, some of the branches detected by the treeQSM may either be false positives or so small in size that the X-rays are unable to detect them as knots, as the method overestimated the whorl count by 19% when compared with the X-rays. On the other hand, the DBSCAN method only detected larger branches and showed a −11% bias in whorl count. Overall, the DBSCAN underestimated knot volumes within trees by 6%, while the treeQSM overestimated them by 25%. When we input the HHLS features into a Random Forest model, the knottiness variables measured at the sawmill were predicted with R 2 s of 0.47–0.64. The results were comparable with previous results derived with the static terrestrial laser scanners. The obtained stem branching data are relevant for predicting wood quality attributes but do not provide data that are directly comparable with the X-ray features. Future work should combine terrestrial point clouds with dense above-canopy point clouds to overcome the limitations related to vertical coverage.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266739322300011X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophoto.2023.100040; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85170387868&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S266739322300011X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophoto.2023.100040
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know