Cross-phase modulation between pulse matched lights in optical loop system
Optics Communications, ISSN: 0030-4018, Vol: 508, Page: 127753
2022
- 1Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We observed conditional cross-phase modulation (C-XPM) applicable to quantum phase gate. Combinations of two probe field’s polarizations conditioned XPM of two probe fields in the corresponding nonlinear optical system. With optimized parameters of multi-photon transition, we could increase C-XPM more than 1 rad. with small probe absorption. Group velocity matching ratio between probe pulses was estimated to 1.2 in the optical loop system. Because multi-photon interference depends on the ratio between the Rabi frequencies of the probe fields, not the individual intensity, we expect the same phase shift between few photons level’s probe pulses in our scheme.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030401821009433; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2021.127753; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85121209946&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0030401821009433; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2021.127753
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know